Automation platforms with included strategies provide pre-built trading logic for futures markets, allowing traders to deploy tested frameworks without coding from scratch. When evaluating these platforms, assess whether included strategies align with your market conditions, risk tolerance, and trading timeframe, while verifying backtested performance data and understanding the limitations of hypothetical results. The true value lies not in the strategies themselves, but in how well the platform allows you to modify, test, and adapt them to your specific trading approach.

Key Takeaways

• Included strategies are starting points, not turnkey solutions—they require customization for your account size, risk parameters, and market conditions
• Evaluate strategy transparency by checking if the platform discloses entry/exit logic, risk management rules, and the testing methodology used
• Backtested results for included strategies may overstate real-world performance due to curve-fitting and lack of slippage modeling
• Platforms offering strategy modification tools provide more long-term value than those with locked, black-box approaches

Table of Contents

• What Are Included Strategies in Automation Platforms
• Types of Included Strategies You'll Find
• How to Evaluate Strategy Transparency
• Platform Customization Capabilities Matter Most
• Understanding Performance Claims and Backtesting
• Assessing the True Value of Included Strategies

What Are Included Strategies in Automation Platforms

Included strategies are pre-configured trading algorithms that come bundled with automation platforms, typically designed for common futures contracts like ES, NQ, GC, or CL. These strategies contain predefined entry signals, exit rules, position sizing logic, and risk parameters that execute automatically when connected to your broker. Most platforms market these as ready-to-deploy solutions for traders who lack programming skills or don't want to build strategies from scratch.

The actual sophistication varies widely. Some platforms offer simple moving average crossovers with basic stop losses, while others provide multi-indicator frameworks with dynamic position sizing and time-based filters. No-code automation platforms typically include 3-15 strategies covering different market conditions—trending, ranging, or volatility-based approaches.

Strategy Template: A pre-built trading framework with configurable parameters like indicator periods, stop loss distances, and position sizes. Templates provide structure while allowing traders to adjust values without rewriting code.

The key distinction is between truly transparent strategies where you can see and modify all logic versus black-box systems where the platform only reveals basic parameters. Platforms like ClearEdge Trading emphasize connecting your own TradingView strategies rather than relying solely on included templates, giving you full control over entry and exit logic.

Types of Included Strategies You'll Find

Most automation platforms organize included strategies by market approach rather than specific indicators. Trend-following strategies typically use moving average systems, breakout logic, or momentum oscillators to enter in the direction of established price movement. Mean-reversion strategies look for overbought/oversold conditions using RSI, Bollinger Bands, or standard deviation bands to fade extremes.

Opening Range strategies are particularly common for ES and NQ futures, capitalizing on the first 15-60 minutes of regular trading hours. These strategies mark high/low boundaries during the opening period and trigger trades on breakouts or rejections. According to CME Group data, ES futures average 1.5 million contracts daily, with the highest volume concentrated in the first 90 minutes after the 9:30 AM ET open.

Strategy TypeMarket ConditionTypical InstrumentsTrend FollowingDirectional moves, trendingES, NQ, CLMean ReversionRange-bound, low volatilityES, GCBreakoutConsolidation into expansionNQ, CLOpening RangeSession opensES, NQNews/EventEconomic releasesES, CL, GC

Event-based strategies target specific economic releases like Non-Farm Payrolls (first Friday monthly, 8:30 AM ET) or FOMC announcements (8x yearly, 2:00 PM ET). These strategies often go flat before high-impact news and re-enter based on initial price reaction. The challenge with included event strategies is they rarely account for changing market conditions—what worked during low-volatility 2017 may fail during 2022's aggressive rate-hike cycle.

How to Evaluate Strategy Transparency

Strategy transparency determines whether you're buying a tool or a black box. Transparent platforms disclose complete entry logic, exit rules, stop loss calculations, and position sizing formulas. You should be able to see exactly what conditions trigger a trade and how the strategy manages risk once in a position.

Ask these specific questions when evaluating included strategies: What indicator values trigger entries? How are stop losses calculated—fixed dollar amount, ATR-based, or percentage? Does the strategy use time-based exits or only price-based? Are there daily loss limits or maximum position caps built in? What backtesting period was used, and does the platform show year-by-year breakdowns?

Strategy Transparency Checklist

• ☐ Complete entry and exit logic disclosed
• ☐ Risk management rules clearly stated
• ☐ Backtesting methodology explained
• ☐ Performance shown year-by-year, not just cumulative
• ☐ Slippage and commission assumptions documented
• ☐ Maximum drawdown and losing streaks reported

Red flags include platforms that only show total return without drawdown data, lack year-by-year breakdowns, or refuse to disclose indicator settings. If the platform won't tell you whether a strategy uses a 20-period or 50-period moving average, you're dealing with a black box. For futures trading where a 4-tick difference in ES ($50) can make or break profitability, this opacity is unacceptable.

Platform Customization Capabilities Matter Most

The ability to modify included strategies determines their long-term usefulness. Markets evolve—volatility patterns change, correlations break down, and strategies that worked in one regime fail in another. Platforms that lock you into fixed strategy parameters force you to either accept suboptimal performance or abandon the strategy entirely.

Meaningful customization includes adjusting indicator periods, changing stop loss distances, modifying position sizing logic, adding time-based filters, and combining multiple conditions. No-code platforms should provide these controls through user-friendly interfaces without requiring programming knowledge. For more technical traders, platforms offering TradingView integration let you build completely custom logic using Pine Script and connect it to automated execution.

Parameter Optimization: The process of testing multiple values for strategy inputs (indicator periods, stop distances) to find settings that performed best historically. Over-optimization or curve-fitting occurs when settings are too specifically tuned to past data and fail in live trading.

The futures automation platform comparison landscape shows a clear divide: some platforms treat included strategies as rigid products, while others position them as educational starting points you're expected to adapt. The latter approach provides more value because you develop understanding of why strategies work rather than blindly deploying someone else's logic.

Testing modifications before live deployment is critical. Platforms should offer paper trading or simulation modes where you can run modified strategies with real market data but no actual capital risk. This lets you verify that your changes improve rather than degrade performance before risking real money.

Understanding Performance Claims and Backtesting

Backtested performance for included strategies represents hypothetical results under ideal conditions, not live trading outcomes. These results typically exclude slippage (the difference between expected and actual fill prices), assume perfect fills at indicator close prices, and may not account for overnight gap risk in futures markets.

According to CFTC Rule 4.41, hypothetical results have inherent limitations because trades have not been executed and may have under or over-compensated for market factors like liquidity. For ES futures with typical bid-ask spreads of 0.25 points ($12.50) during regular hours, a strategy generating 50 trades per month faces $625 in slippage costs not always reflected in backtests.

Performance MetricWhat It RevealsRed FlagsTotal ReturnOverall profitabilityShown without drawdown contextMaximum DrawdownWorst peak-to-valley lossNot disclosed or buriedWin RatePercentage of winning tradesAbove 70% (often curve-fit)Profit FactorGross profit / gross lossAbove 3.0 (likely over-optimized)Sharpe RatioRisk-adjusted returnsAbove 3.0 in futures (unrealistic)

Be especially skeptical of strategies showing consistent profitability every single year with minimal drawdowns. Real trading involves losing periods. A strategy showing 8 winning years and 2 losing years over a decade is more credible than one claiming 10 consecutive winning years.

Forward testing results (if provided) carry more weight than backtests. Forward testing means running the strategy in real-time or on out-of-sample data not used during development. If a platform shows 5 years of backtest data and 6 months of forward test results, focus on those 6 months—they're closer to what you'll experience live.

Assessing the True Value of Included Strategies

The value of automation platform included strategies lies in education and time savings, not plug-and-play profitability. A well-documented included strategy teaches you how specific indicators combine to create entry signals, how stop losses should relate to market volatility, and how position sizing scales with account equity. This educational foundation helps you develop your own strategies over time.

Time savings come from having a working framework rather than starting from blank code. If you want to test whether Opening Range breakouts work for your trading style, starting with an included OR strategy and modifying it saves dozens of hours versus building from scratch. But expecting that included strategy to generate consistent profits without modification is unrealistic.

Value Provided

• Learning framework for strategy construction
• Starting point for customization and testing
• Quick deployment for initial paper trading
• Reference examples for risk management approaches

Limitations

• Backtested performance rarely matches live results
• Generic parameters not optimized for your risk tolerance
• May be over-fit to historical market conditions
• Black-box strategies prevent meaningful adaptation

Price should reflect this educational value rather than implying guaranteed profitability. Platforms charging premium prices primarily for included strategies should demonstrate substantial ongoing development, regular updates as market conditions change, and responsive support when strategies underperform. Platforms like ClearEdge Trading focus on providing robust execution infrastructure and letting you bring your own strategy logic from TradingView, which often provides more long-term value than proprietary included strategies.

The best approach combines included strategies as learning tools with gradual customization based on your own testing. Start by paper trading an included strategy without modifications to understand its behavior. Then systematically test parameter changes one variable at a time, documenting results. This process builds your strategic thinking skills while reducing dependence on vendor-provided logic.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Can I profitably trade included strategies without modifications?

It's unlikely that unmodified included strategies will generate consistent profits long-term because they use generic parameters not tailored to your risk tolerance, account size, or market conditions. Treat included strategies as starting points requiring customization based on your own testing and market analysis.

2. How do I know if included strategy performance is realistic?

Realistic performance shows year-by-year variability including losing periods, maximum drawdowns of 15-25% for aggressive strategies, win rates between 40-60%, and profit factors between 1.3-2.0. Be skeptical of results showing consistent annual gains without drawdowns or unusually high win rates above 70%.

3. What's the difference between strategy templates and fully automated strategies?

Strategy templates provide a framework with customizable parameters you must configure, while fully automated strategies have preset values and execute without additional setup. Templates offer more flexibility but require more understanding, while automated strategies are faster to deploy but less adaptable to changing conditions.

4. Should I use multiple included strategies simultaneously?

Running multiple strategies can improve diversification if they use different market approaches and instruments, but ensure they don't over-leverage your account. If three strategies each risk 2% per trade and all trigger simultaneously on correlated instruments like ES and NQ, you're risking 6% despite intending 2% per strategy.

5. How often should included strategies be updated by the platform?

Quality platforms review and update included strategies at least quarterly, especially after significant market regime changes like Federal Reserve policy shifts. If a platform hasn't updated strategies in over a year despite major volatility changes, the strategies may be abandoned or under-supported.

Conclusion

Automation platform included strategies provide valuable learning frameworks and time-saving starting points, but require customization and realistic expectations about performance. Focus on platforms offering transparency about strategy logic, robust customization tools, and honest performance disclosures including drawdowns and losing periods.

The most successful approach treats included strategies as educational resources rather than turnkey profit generators. Start with paper trading to understand strategy behavior, systematically test modifications based on your risk parameters, and gradually develop your own strategic thinking. For comprehensive guidance on building and automating your own strategies, see our complete platform comparison guide.

Ready to automate your own trading strategies? Explore ClearEdge Trading and connect your TradingView logic to automated futures execution with full transparency and control.

References

1. CME Group. "E-mini S&P 500 Futures Contract Specs." https://www.cmegroup.com/markets/equities/sp/e-mini-sp500.html
2. Commodity Futures Trading Commission. "CFTC Rule 4.41 - Hypothetical Performance Results." https://www.cftc.gov
3. TradingView. "Pine Script Language Reference." https://www.tradingview.com/pine-script-reference/
4. Futures Industry Association. "Annual Volume Report 2024." https://www.fia.org

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only. It is not trading advice. ClearEdge Trading executes trades based on your rules—it does not provide signals or recommendations.

Risk Warning: Futures trading involves substantial risk. You could lose more than your initial investment. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Only trade with capital you can afford to lose.

CFTC RULE 4.41: Hypothetical results have limitations and do not represent actual trading.

By: ClearEdge Trading Team | About

Heading 1

Heading 2

Heading 3

Heading 4

Heading 5

Heading 6

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.

Block quote

Ordered list

1. Item 1
2. Item 2
3. Item 3

Unordered list

• Item A
• Item B
• Item C

Text link

Bold text

Emphasis

^Superscript

_Subscript